Connect with us

Analysis

Bitcoin [BTC/USD] Technical Analysis: Bears continue to hold cryptocurrency captive as prices stagnate

Akash Anand

Published

on

Bitcoin [BTC/USD] Technical Analysis: Bears continue to hold cryptocurrency captive as prices stagnate
Source: Unsplash

The cryptocurrency market’s rise and fall have been quite sporadic, with several coins shifting between the green and the red spectrum over the past couple of days. Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin [BTC], Ethereum [ETH] and XRP have all been trying to get out of the bear zone, but to no avail.

1-hour:

The Bitcoin [BTC] one-hour graph shows a mix of uptrends and downtrends that have skewed towards the bear’s domain. The uptrend indicates the price being lifted from $6,435.79 to $6,531.12. The succeeding downtrend brought the price down from $6,486.70 to $6,306.78. The support has been holding at $6,287.38, while the immediate resistance is set at $6,528.95.

The Awesome Oscillator [AO] shows the Bitcoin market momentum picking up after a lull. Over the past couple of days, Bitcoin’s momentum has been relatively greater than before.

The Relative Strength Indicator [RSI] puts the graph near the oversold zone. This is a sign of the selling pressure being more than the buying pressure. The graph also shows that Bitcoin had fallen towards the oversold zone from the fringes of the overbought zone.

1-day:

The one-day graph shows an acute downtrend, which has brought the price down from $8,396.83 to $6,500.88. The support for the daily graph has been holding at $5,827.11.

The Chaikin Money Flow [CMF] indicates the graph spiking just above the axis, which is a bullish sign. The CMF uptrend also points to money flowing into the market because of a change in the investor sentiments.

The Bollinger bands are in the midst of a sideways movement with the upper and lower band diverging ever so slightly. The divergence can result in an outbreak that, at the moment, is venturing into bearish territory.

Conclusion

Bitcoin [BTC] does not seem to be heading into any major bullish spike, as shown by the indicators. Although the CMF and AO point to a slight bullish run, a bear run looks to continue, coupled with sideways price movements.





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


News

Bitcoin and Ethereum Classic find themselves on opposite ends of the 51% attack spectrum

Avatar

Published

on

Bitcoin and Ethereum Classic find themselves on opposite ends of the 51% attack spectrum
Source: Unsplash

Every revolutionary product comes with its own fallacy. However, to its internal metrics, in order for that product to remain adherent to the principle it hopes to expound, the cryptocurrency world is no less. Bitcoin [BTC] and other Proof-of-Work [PoW] cryptos have an in-built fallacy as well, the dreaded “51 percent attack.”

A recent study by cryptocurrency analytics firm LongHash, detailed the cryptocurrencies that are the closest to being subjected to the aforementioned attack.

The report looked at ten of the most significant PoW coins including, Bitcoin, Ethereum [ETH], Bitcoin Cash [BCH], Litecoin [LTC], Dash [DASH], Bitcoin SV [BSV], Zcash [ZEC], Monero [XMR], Ethereum Classic [ETC], and Bitcoin Gold [BTG].

Prior to detailing the study, Longhash listed out the two key points required to execute a 51 percent attack. First, a single mining pool/entity/individual would have to control over 50 percent of a network’s mining power. Second, the energy expenses related to the same, based on renting or sheer purchase of mining power.

Dividing the parameters of performance into two key parts, LongHash initially looked at the one-hour attack cost based on data from OnChainFX as on June 19, and consequently, the percentage of mining power available for rent on NiceHash. The matrix for an unsuccessful attack would be a high one-hour attack cost with low power availability, deeming the network “quite safe.”

Source: LongHash

Bitcoin took the top spot, with the report stating that there exists “very little power available to rent,” coupled with a “very high hourly attack cost.”

Traversing down the estimate cost Y-axis, several coins are scattered including, LTC, ETH, BCH, ZEC, BSV, DASH, and XMR, citing low power available via NiceHash. However, the estimated cost to rent the mining power is fairly low.

The report added,

“Most tokens, however, are clustered in the bottom-right corner of our chart, with low mining power availability and hourly attack costs north of $10,000, which makes them appear relatively safe.”

Moving horizontally further down the total mining power X-axis, BTG is the sole cryptocurrency exhibiting around 35 percent mining power availability on Nice Hash, with the lowest estimated cost to rent 51 percent of mining power for sixty minutes.

The biggest worry by far, was Ethereum Classic. The ETH hardfork had more than 80 percent of its mining power available on NiceHash, while the hourly attack was estimated to cost less than $10,000.

Earlier this year, the ETC network was the subject of a 51 percent attack, with several exchanges pausing ETC-related transactions in the process. The attack led to several cases of network double-spends and re-organisations totaling around $1.1 million or 219,500 ETC.





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


Continue Reading