Connect with us

Bitcoin Cash

Bitcoin Cash [BCH] politics sees developments as Jihan Wu, Litecoin [LTC]’s Charlie Lee and ‘Bitcoin Jesus’ team up against Faketoshi

Anirudh VK

Published

on

Bitcoin Cash [BCH] politics sees developments as Jihan Wu, Litecoin [LTC]'s Charlie Lee and 'Bitcoin Jesus' team up against Faketoshi
Source: Unsplash

The Bitcoin Cash [BCH] blockchain’s upcoming hard fork has driven the cryptocurrency ecosystem’s eyes to it, owing to the huge amount of drama surrounding it. More recently, the CEO of Bitmain, Jihan Wu, accused Craig “Faketoshi” Wright of being a “Blockstream spy” as Roger Ver began his involvement in the politics of the fork.

Wu also provided more comments on the fork, stating today:

“The whole BCH community are working together to kick Fake Satoshi out. The resisitence against cult leader proves the inner strength and sophistication of the BCH ecosystem!”

This is the latest in a series of tweets dismissing Craig Wright’s authority, as he claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright’s claims are also reflected in an email he sent to Roger Ver, the CEO of Bitcoin.com, in which he claimed:

“Bitcoin will die before ABC shits on it. I will see BCH trade at 0 for a few hours. Will you? Side with ABC, you hate Bitcoin, you are my enemy. You have fucking no idea what that means. I AM Satoshi.”

However, other cryptocurrency communities have also begun joining the fray, as seen by Tazz Alam, a BTC supporter stating:

“As a $BTC (Semi) Maximalist, i gotta say I’m loving this drama.. you guys barely had any support as a whole and now that you’re fighting each other constantly, you will be even more divided and less supported.. on behalf of the $BTC community: Thank you.”

Twitter user Tommy Mustache stated:



“Cut your losses with BCH and come back to the good side. You got persuaded (tricked) by the smooth Roger Ver who can sell ice to an Eskimo if he wants to. I know you will lose over $100m, but you will regain respect and love from the crypto community again. Money can’t buy that.”

Charlie Lee, the creator of Litecoin [LTC]:

“Bitcoin Satoshi Vision is the real Bitcoin Cash. Karma’s a BCH”

Cobra, the handler of Bitcoin.org and previously a supporter of Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision, stated:

“This time last year the Bitcoin community defeated: BITMAIN, ViaBTC, Bitfury, + other miners adding up to >80% hashrate, Jeff Garzik, Gavin Andresen, Coinbase, BitPay, Xapo, Blockchain, venture capitalists, etc. Bitcoin Cash now struggles with a greater opponent: Craig Wright.”





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter




Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook



Anirudh VK is a full-time journalist at AMBCrypto. He has a passion for writing and interest towards the future of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. He does not own any cryptocurrencies currently.

News

BSV STN is mining 1.4-gigabyte blocks; Is this a scaling solution or a journey towards centralization?

Avatar

Published

on

Source: Unsplash

Bitcoin SV, the fork of Bitcoin Cash, has set up an STN [Scaling Test Network], specifically intended to test on-chain scaling for large blocks, which also acts as a standard network in the latest update of Bitcoin SV. It was noted that the STN was mining blocks that were more than 1 GB in block size, a development that was celebrated in the BSV camp after a Twitter user, @two2wheel2life, tweeted,

BSV has a total of four such networks defined, i.e., Mainnet, testnet, regtest, and STN. According to the website, STN was implemented to reduce the impact of scalability testing on testnet and to preserve testnet as a network for testing of applications built on top of Bitcoin SV, without requiring testnet users to make significant hardware available.

Block 11891 on the STN was 0.95 GB in size and processed a total of 9530 transactions in the block. Block 11901 was 1 GB in size, and block 11902 was 1.4 GB in size, which could possibly be the biggest block mined on the STN.

Source: Stn.satoshi.io

Is Bigger Better?

The question of bigger block sizes has sparked quite a few debates, be it Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, or Bitcoin SV. It was one of the reasons why Bitcoin Cash forked from Bitcoin and why Bitcoin SV forked from Bitcoin Cash.

However, does massive block size really solve the scaling problem without any drawbacks? The Operations Manager of STN, Brad Kristensen, had some interesting things to say to AMBCrypto about the recent achievements of the STN.

Brad stated,

“We’re very pleased with the results, and I think it’s a strong signal of what is to come from Bitcoin SV on mainnet as we continue to increase adoption. The STN is running the same public release available right now (0.2.0). Anyone can join the STN to test their applications /services.”

According to BSV’s roadmap, the first upgrade for the project will be ‘Quasar,’ which is proposed for July 24, 2019, and will concentrate on scaling by increasing the default block size hard cap.

Centralization or scaling?

Andreas Antonopoulos, a prominent Bitcoin advocate, had a different opinion on the rise in block size for Bitcoin SV. When AMBCrypto reached out to him, he commented,

“Large blocks have a centralizing effect on mining and node operators. It is unlikely that the main BTC chain will increase the blocksize as it has taken a different path for scaling, via layer-2 payment channels (Lightning Network) and on-chain optimizations (Segwit, Schnorr etc.).”

As stated by Antonopoulos at the ‘Bitcoins in Bali’ meetup on June 27, 2017, if the block size is increased in orders of magnitude at a rate that is proportional to the increase in user base, a difficult problem will emerge wherein Bitcoin transitions from a decentralized to a centralized system.

Additionally, Antonopoulos said,



“If my block takes 11 minutes to validate, then i’m off the blockchain, which means fewer people can validate independently, which means the system becomes centralized. With which one of these increases, fewer people can participate in the validation process, fewer people can participate in storing the data, and fewer people can participate in being independent actors. We go from a system that is decentralized to a system that gradually gets more and more centralized.”

The above gives a clear idea of what could happen if the block size increases. However, Craig Wright announced in one of his Medium articles of his plans to increase the block size, giving his opinion on the same,

“The reality is that scaling on-chain is much simpler than anyone likes to admit. There is nothing special to be done in order to achieve this, it is just allowing commercial systems to compete and to remove the false idea that home use and hobby nodes need to be subsidized”

So, how will BSV fare? Will it still be successful after implementing larger blocksize or will it accept the centralization that comes with increased block sizes? Only time will tell.





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


Continue Reading

Trending