Craig Wright, the famous crypto entrepreneur, and Bitcoin SV [BSV] proponent was denied attempts to dismiss a lawsuit against him by the US federal court. The self-proclaimed bitcoin inventor is alleged in plotting to seize billions of dollars worth bitcoins of a former business partner.
Wright partnered with late Dave Kleiman, a forensic computer investigator, and author. Dave passed away in 2013 after succumbing to MRSA. Dave’s brother, Ira Kleiman has sued Wright on behalf of his brother’s estate.
Wright is being accused of plotting to “seize Dave’s bitcoins and his rights to certain intellectual property associated with the bitcoin technology,” and is trying to get a part of the 1.1 million bitcoins mined by him and Dace, or get “fair market value” along with compensation for Intellectual property infringement.
Wright, who has previously claimed of being Bitcoin’s creator Satoshi Nakamoto, tried to dismiss the case and thus filed a motion in April this year for the same. However, most counts of Wright’s motion have been defined, revealed a document file in Florida.
The order states:
“Here, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged a claim for conversion. The Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant converted at least 300,000 bitcoins upon Dave’s death and transferred them to various international trusts, which was an unauthorized act that deprived the Plaintiffs of the bitcoins therein. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ claim for conversion (Count I) survives Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.”
However, in many places within the document, the court states that they are yet to determine the exact number of BTCs involved. The court alleges that it “entitled to at least 300,000 bitcoins, along with their forked assets.”
Wright’s motion did succeed on the claims that count III and IV over misappropriation of “trade secrets” were invalid, as the three-year statute of limitation in Florida had been exceeded, reported Coindesk.
The plaintiffs were aware of Wright’s conduct on April 22, 2014, indicates the order. The order added:
“Even if they did not know the extent of the harm, upon learning of the Defendant’s conduct from the ATO auditor, the Plaintiffs should have discovered the Defendant’s misapplication of the trade secrets through the ‘exercise of reasonable diligence.'”
The publication also noted that the BSV proponent has time till January 10, 2019, to respond on counts I, II and V-IX.
Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter
Ethereum [ETH] experiences major drop of 94% in block transactions since last year
XRP/USD Price Analysis: Prices stagnate as the bears and the bulls continue to brawl
Bitcoin [BTC] developer Jimmy Song lists 3 reasons why Bitcoin SV [BSV] is a “scam”
Ethereum [ETH/USD] Price Analysis: Coin stands tall with the bull by its side
SEC could include Bitwise’s Bitcoin ETF in federal registers; proposal under review for approval
Ripple/XRP: XRP will soon hit Abra cryptocurrency platform, confirms CEO Bill Barhydt
DigiByte community gears up for Global Summit while founder Jared Tate finalises book on decentralized internet
Tron [TRX]’s Justin Sun sets up Valentines day surprise for Ethereum [ETH]’s Vitalik Buterin
After Bitcoin [BTC] ETF silver lining, SEC puts forth circular on ICOs
Ethereum [ETH] could have been stolen through malware impersonating MetaMask
Bitcoin [BTC] among cryptocurrencies enabled by new debit card launched by Australian Crypto exchange
Nouriel Roubini says JP Morgan’s cryptocurrency JPM Coin is a joke; compares it to XRP
Ethereum [ETH] mining rewards breach lowest levels ever as average difficulty spikes
Coinbase steps up Bug Bounty program; rewards hacker $30,000 for critical bug detection