Connect with us


Charlie Lee states he sold Litecoin [LTC] because it was a “conflict of interest”

Anirudh VK



Charlie Lee states he sold Litecoin [LTC] because it was a "conflict of interest"
Source: Unsplash

Charlie Lee, the creator of Litecoin [LTC] and the Managing Director of Litecoin Foundation, recently spoke at the Annual Litecoin Summit. In his speech, Lee addressed the issue that many detractors of Litecoin bring up, namely that he sold his portion of Litecoin when it was at an all-time high in December.

This has been a talking point for many in the Litecoin community, as those who speak against the cryptocurrency state that even the creator of the coin sold all of them. Moreover, the prevalent argument is that Charlie Lee has no “skin in the game”, which is to say that he has no financial motivation to continue the development of Litecoin.

He began his keynote speech at the summit by speaking about this issue, presenting with a meme that said “Believe in something, even if it means selling everything…Just Exit”, with a picture of him. While he stated that he was upset the first time he saw it on Twitter, he said that he agreed with it because he believed in Litecoin so much that he was willing to sell everything. He stated:

“The first question people people ask is, ‘Then I don’t have skin in the game’. What if Mark Zuckerberg sold all his Facebook shares, what does that mean about Facebook. That means he doesn’t believe in it right. So why can I sell all my Litecoins and still believe in it that doesn’t make any sense.”

He went on to explain that Litecoin is not a company, which means that the price of the coin is not tied to the success of a company. In the case of Mark Zuckerberg, Lee stated that he works for the shareholders so he can increase the price of the stock and then profit. However, in the case of Litecoin, Lee stated that “it doesn’t really matter too much”.

Elaborating on this, he stated that it was because Litecoin was decentralized money and that the price doesn’t “matter too much” as long as it was sound money. He stated:

“I’m focused on adoption for Litecoin. I’m not focused on the price. The price will go up, the price will do what the price stuff does. Adoption is what I care about.”

Moreover, Lee explained that wanting the coin to succeed would translate as a conflict of opinion. This is due to the fact that Litecoin was like his baby because he had created it. He went on to say:

“You ask a parent why don’t they have skin in the game with their kids. Why don’t they bet like a million dollars that their kid will get into college? Well, there you see the conflict of interest. You want the kid to succeed in life but you don’t necessarily need to have money on the line because when you do actually have money on the line. You potentially may have some conflict.”

Furthermore, he said that this was the same reason he did not need skin in the game, as then he would do something that hurts the long-term adoption of the coin. He went on to say that it was hard to explain to people because most of them were in it for the money. He stated:

“I’m still using it. I still use it for purchases whenever I can. To me, time is more valuable than money I spend. Right now working full-time on Litecoin and yeah so  I definitely have skin in the game. Now I don’t have to worry about money so I can basically work on Litecoin for the rest of my life.”

Lee stated that if he had not sold then he might have to go and work for another company and could not spend time on Litecoin, which would “suck”.

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook

Anirudh VK is a full-time journalist at AMBCrypto. He has a passion for writing and interest towards the future of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. He does not own any cryptocurrencies currently.


Whale Alert: Massive $300 million transfer takes place on Binance Chain; funds SAFU, says CZ

Biraajmaan Tamuly



Whale Alert: Massive 300 million BNB Coin transfer takes place on the Binance Chain; CZ responds amidst transaction
Source: Pixabay

Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, has been having a wonderful year in terms of new developments, such as their new Binance DEX and the massive growth of Binance Coin [BNB]. Binance’s native token has grown by approximately 500 percent in 2019 alone.

The exchange also recently announced the launch of BTCB, with an objective to provide a crypto-asset pegged to BTC’s value for trading purposes on Binance DEX, with the assets being backed by Binance itself.

Binance’s ecosystem is progressively active and it was recently observed and reported by Whale Alert, an online cryptocurrency-transaction tracker, that a sum of approximately $302 million, equivalent to around 8 million BNB coins, was transferred on the Binance Chain.

The transaction took place of 26th January 2019, with a time stamp of 07:52:56 UTC. It was sent from an unknown address, bnb1jkvrjawcd8wlugk8455wqjggxecyxj9uf0g7uy, to another unknown wallet, bnb13wmeg7ypkcr39wnzy2q02mku2qemnrm4kclezs, for a transaction fee of 0.000375 BNB. The block height of the transaction was #15820220, and it was deemed a successful one.

Following the massive transfer, Changpeng Zhao, CEO of Binance, responded on Twitter regarding the transfer and claimed that the current movement was a rotation of funds between some cold wallets.

CZ suggested with a linked tweet that the movement of funds should not necessarily raise any alarms as the funds were SAFU.

In another tweet, CZ  stated that there were currently 4 addresses that were holding 8 million BNB coins each. A total of $32 million BNB was unlocked for the Binance team. However, it was understood that the tokens were not spent and saved in the addresses themselves.

It is speculated that CZ took the initiative to list the reason for the massive transfer as previously, huge BTC transfers, which included a Coinbase wallet transfer, was accused of market manipulation.

At press time, BNB coin was priced at $37.30, experiencing a hike of 1.87 percent over the past 24 hours.

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Continue Reading