Skip to content
Active Currencies: 17,428
Market Cap: $2.316T
Bitcoin Dominance: 56.20%
24h Market Cap Change: $-1.38

CZ breaks silence as White House order aims to dismantle Operation Chokepoint 3.0

Will the White House finally pull the plug on Operation Chokepoint 3.0 this week?

Operation Chokepoint 3.0 ends

Key Takeaways

Banks may soon face penalties for politically motivated financial restrictions, particularly against crypto firms, as the White House’s upcoming order could reshape institutional behavior in the digital asset space.


The White House is reportedly preparing to strike down discriminatory banking practices, long criticized as “Operation Chokepoint 3.0.”

For context, this is a controversial banking trend where financial institutions are accused of denying services to politically disfavored sectors, particularly digital asset firms.

Will Operation Chokepoint 3.0 come to an end?

According to a draft executive order reviewed by Reuters, the Trump administration is considering enforcement measures.

These would penalize banks found making ideologically driven decisions that violate the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws, or consumer protection rules.

Paul Barron emphasized that banks found guilty of such conduct may be fined.

Source: X

This comes at a time when incidents like JPMorgan’s alleged decision to freeze Gemini’s re-onboarding process, reportedly triggered by Tyler Winklevoss’ public criticism, have reignited debate over fairness and access in the banking sector.

Expressing his stance, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao took to X and noted

“It used to be that corresponding banks in the US block transactions involving crypto (fiat for buying crypto). This opens banking for crypto internationally.”

When did the crypto curbing start?

The roots of this crackdown trace back to what many called “Operation Chokepoint 2.0.”

Since 2021, crypto firms claim they’ve faced targeted de-banking from institutions like JPMorgan and Bank of America.

Industry leaders like Elon Musk and Ripple CTO David Schwartz have openly criticized the trend, with Schwartz labeling it as a form of indirect government regulation.

More recently, Alex Rampell, General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz, also pointed out that while previous chokepoints may have been regulator-driven, the current wave appears to stem from the banks themselves, raising fresh concerns about fairness and institutional bias.

Banks are denying such accusations

Despite widespread criticism, major banks deny acting out of political motivations. But with rising pressure from conservative policymakers and crypto advocates, the Trump administration is now moving fast.

The draft order could mark a significant reversal, reaffirming ideological neutrality in the financial system and potentially dismantling Operation Chokepoint 3.0 for good.

Disclaimer: AMBCrypto's content is meant to be informational in nature and should not be interpreted as investment advice. Trading, buying or selling cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk investment and every reader is advised to do their own research before making any decisions.

Ishika Kumari

Journalist

Ishika Kumari is a Crypto Analyst at AMBCrypto, specializing in regulatory developments, market dynamics, and blockchain’s real-world impact. She breaks down complex protocols and legislation into practical, easy-to-understand insights.

AMBCrypto was founded in 2018 with a mission to simplify and bring the latest blockchain and cryptocurrency news to our readers. We have quickly grown into the digital news source for an emerging generation of cryptocurrency enthusiasts, reaching more than a million readers on a monthly basis, across the globe.