Connect with us

Global News

Dow Jones stocks enter buy range but lack trading volume

Guest Author

Published

on

Dow Jones stocks enter buy range but lack trading volume
Source: Pixabay

Dow Jones stocks Microsoft [MSFT], Cisco Systems [CSCo] and Walmart [WMT] moved into the buy range on Friday. However, the volume range of the stocks could be a cause of concern for investors.

The relative strength lines of these stocks are not very impressive in the current stock market rally. Cisco’s RS line is not too far off highs, reported Investors Business Daily. The Dow Stocks are not registering tremendous growth, even after registering success in shifting towards faster-growth markets.

Source: Trading view

Source: Trading View

On Friday, the market opened at 25,800.49 and climbed 81.86 points to close at 25,882.30. A minimal growth of 0.32% saw most stocks pumping by very meager amounts.

Microsoft stock rose by 1.3% to 108.22 in Friday’s market, clearing a 108 buy point from a cup-with-handle base, however, the volume was reported to be 31% below normal. As per the publication, the weekly volume was the lowest ever since late September.

Walmart’s stock climbed 1.5% to 99.99 and the volume registered was 6% more than the average. However, Cisco stock hiked by 2.1% to 49.43 and closed above 49.24 double-bottom buy point. The volume of the stock was 13% above normal, which is comparatively better than other Dow stocks.



A market enthusiast on Twitter, @dmadden_CMC, tweeted:

“The Dow Jones has been pushing higher since late December. Positive momentum is rising. While it holds above the 200-day moving average at 25,067, its outlook should remain positive. 26,278 might act as resistance. $DJI”

While another Twitter user, @ThinkTankCharts said:

“Dow Jones climb on Friday was above the Feb 28th 2017 high of 25800.35, by 83 points. Oil continues to climb, so this and the FAANGs will likely take the Dow Industrials up from here. They may be able to relax over 25800. StochRSI 40 says hold long. Swing tests coming up next “

 





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter




Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook



AMBCrypto is not responsible for the content included in this article. Readers' discretion is required while visiting the links given in the report as AMBCrypto is not responsible for the products or services.

Ripple

Ripple’s XRP II in fresh controversy after NYDFS denies FOIL requesting affiliate sales, discount policies

Febin Jose

Published

on

Ripple’s XRP II in fresh controversy after NYDFS denies FOIL requesting affiliate sales, discount policies
Source: Pixabay

Ripple has been consistently expanding its horizon in the cross-border remittance field. Its cryptocurrency, XRP, also registered an extended slump in a rather bullish market, over much of the past few months. XRP failed to post substantial gains until recently, even as Bitcoin breached multiple resistances. On May 14, following news related to Bitcoin’s surge over $8,000 and Coinbase enabling XRP trading for its New York users, the coin saw a double-digit resurgence.

Just when it seemed like XRP was finally on its way out of a bearish pullback, fresh trouble surfaced. In a Twitter thread, Ryan Selkis, Founder of Messari Crypto, stated that his FOIL request with the NYDFS regarding Ripple’s XRP II affiliate sales and discounts was denied, hinting at foul play on the part of Ripple and its subsidiary.

XRP II, LL is a subsidiary of parent company, Ripple, and is registered as a licensed money service business, mostly to institutional investors. In his FOIL request, a formal submission requesting information from New York state on the basis of New York’s Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], Selkis had requested for information on three aspects of XRP II.

The first question was regarding the “average sales price that XRP II has offered its enterprise customers from 2016 to 2019,” while the second and third questions were dealt with the implied discount to spot rate and the total XRP sold via XRP II, respectively. Though Selkis filed the FOIL request on January 29, 2019, it was only on May 13 that he received a reply, which is approximately three-and-a-half months after the filing date.

According to the reply he received, the reason stated for denial of the FOIL was that disclosure of such sensitive information would cause “substantial competitive injury to the subject enterprise.” Commenting on the reason given by the financial body for denying his request, Selkis stated in an apparent sarcastic tone that “disclosing the discounts Ripple and its affiliate were negotiating with its heavily marketed commercial partners was off-limits.”

He further accused NYDFS of deeming “public benefit” inconsequential and alleged that NYDFS did not believe that public XRP investors had the right to know the discounts to spot that its affiliates receive and the implied dilution rate.



Furthermore, he equated the denial of his FOIL request to “regulatory capture.” He said,

“If a regulated entity can get away with this sort of material obfuscation, imagine what the status quo is today in crypto.”

Though it is unlikely that this news would affect the larger public sentiment, many Twitter users encouraged Selkis to get to the bottom of this and expose any illegal doing. Twitter user, @TheGloballer, commented,

“I love the truth-seeking for shady crypto practices.  Keep up the pursuit. Especially XRP.”





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


Continue Reading

Trending