Connect with us


Litecoin [LTC]’s Charlie Lee speaks about the intrinsic value of Bitcoin [BTC]

Anirudh VK



Litecoin [LTC]'s Charlie Lee speaks about the intrinsic value of Bitcoin [BTC]
Source: Unsplash

Charlie Lee, the creator of Litecoin [LTC] recently spoke at the CoinsBank Blockchain Cruise, where he elaborated upon the intrinsic value of Bitcoin [BTC]. While the price of the cryptocurrency is determined mainly by speculative trading, the intrinsic value of the coin is a different story.

Lee aimed to narrow down the intrinsic value of the coin by breaking down the four fundamental factors towards it. He began by offering background on quotes made by individuals such as the current Chairman of the United States Federal Reserve, and prominent stockbroker Peter Schiff. These quotes stated that the cryptocurrency does not really have intrinsic value, with Schiff calling it “digital fool’s gold”.

Lee, however, offered a contrast to this point, stating that he had 4 points that made Bitcoin intrinsically valuable. He began by speaking about how Bitcoin was not censorable, as it cannot be changed by one person, company or government.

To illustrate what censorship resistance meant, he offered an anecdote from his own life.

Lee stated that he used to play online poker in the years 2010 and 2011 when the online gambling industry was at its peak. However, he related an instance wherein the United States Government came down on the three biggest online poker marketplaces at the time over accusations of wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering.

Lee stated:

“All the payments to poker sites were blocked. Visa payments, Mastercard payments and any payment processors. Online poker was effectively censored. It’s my money, why can’t I use it to play poker online when poker is legal, its a game of skill. A couple of months after that I found out about Bitcoin. It’s not controlled by any governments, it’s not controlled by corporations, You can play online poker and no one can stop you.”

He went on to state that the intrinsic value of Bitcoin comes from the fact that it cannot be blocked from spending, like fiat money can by the government.

The second point Lee brought up was that transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain were immutable. Due to the general design of the blockchain and the Proof-of-Work algorithm, one transaction in a previous block cannot be changed without doing the work and changing the block header of every block in the blockchain.

Lee likened it to the miners pushing the chain deeper and deeper into the ground with every block added to the chain, with the maximum amount of work to be done when trying to change transactions in the first block of the blockchain. He stated:

“If you send someone a million dollars that person will want to wait for one hour or one day because once it’s in the blockchain and there are a lot of blocks on top of it, it’s effectively immutable. For all intents and purposes, its not cost-effective to change a transaction.”

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook

Anirudh VK is a full-time journalist at AMBCrypto. He has a passion for writing and interest towards the future of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. He does not own any cryptocurrencies currently.


Bitcoin SV [BSV] gets hit with another reorg as multiple blocks get orphaned, including a 128 MB block

Akash Anand



Bitcoin SV [BSV] gets hit with another reorg as multiple blocks get orphaned, including a 128 MB block
Source: Pixabay

Bitcoin SV [BSV] and its proponents have been making headlines over the past couple of weeks, either due to developments or because of comments made by its major proponents, Craig Wright, the chief scientist at nChain, and Calvin Ayre.

The network was also hit with several members of the cryptocurrency community alleging that the cryptocurrency itself is a sham without any use cases, as evidenced by its delisting on several popular cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, Kraken and Shapeshift.

The latest news added salt to BSV’s wounds after it was revealed that the network went through another blockchain reorganization on a 128 MB block. This fact was pointed out by Nikita Zhavoronkov, the lead developer of Blockchair, who had tweeted:

“Whoops! $BSV has experienced yet another reorg, this time 6 (six!) consecutive blocks were orphaned (#578640–578645), this chain included a 128 MB block #578644 🤦‍♂️ The network was basically stuck for 1.5 hours, and this shows that even 6 confirmations are not enough.”

Orphaned blocks are valid blocks which are not part of the main chain. There are ways that they can occur naturally when two miners produce blocks at similar times or they can be a result of an attacker with enough hashing power using it for nefarious activities like reversing transactions.

A major reason why this reorg event made news was that a major 128 MB block was stuck in transaction, something that was not supposed to occur according to the initial claims made by the SV camp. Supporters of the cryptocurrency, however, have stated that despite being slower than promised, the transactions on the block settled faster than that on a Bitcoin Core block.

One supporter of BSV, mboyd1, tweeted:

“Orphaned blocks are a feature, not a bug”

To this tweet, Zyo, another cryptocurrency enthusiast replied:

“yes, but orphaning 6 blocks in a row is not good, that means that 6 confirmations is not safe. It’s a bug because the 100+ MB take way too long to propagate and validate. There is a reason why BCH doesn’t have [yet] 100+ MB blocks.”

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Continue Reading