Connect with us

Bitcoin

MimbleWimble is a really interesting trade-off, says author of Mastering Bitcoin

Priya

Published

on

MimbleWimble is a really interesting trade-off, says author of Mastering Bitcoin
Source: Unsplash

Andreas M Antonopoulos, a well-known Bitcoin proponent and the author of Mastering Bitcoin, spoke about MimbleWimble in a Q&A session on Youtube. The author elucidated on the difference between this protocol and the other protocols proposing the same solution.

MimbleWimble is the protocol that was introduced in the year 2016, by Tom Elvis Jedusor, an anonymous developer, to solve the privacy and scalability problems of Bitcoin. The very implementation of the protocol resulted in Grin being recognized as the closest version of Bitcoin.

This protocol enables users to make transactions without revealing the amount of cryptocurrencies that are sent and the addresses involved in the transaction. The protocol reveals just enough information that is required to verify the transaction. The use-case of this has resulted in even the top coins in the market such as Monero [XMR] announcing the implementation of the protocol.

During the Q&A session, Andreas remarked that MimbleWimble’s anonymous characteristics “massively decreases the amount of space you need for the blockchain.”



“It is a really interesting [solution to an important] trade-off because, until now, [there has been a trade-off where] privacy came at the cost of scalability. Many previous attempts at high privacy in blockchains, such as zero-knowledge [proofs] in zk-SNARKs, and other zero-knowledge proof based systems…”

He went on to say that this held true to one of the proposals for Bitcoin as well, Confidential Transactions, wherein it enables private transactions but increased the size from 200 bytes to 20 kilobytes. This is around two to three orders of magnitude bigger than the average transaction of Bitcoin. The author added that the trade-off has always been a problem.

“A lot of cryptographers and computer scientists have found ways to introduce privacy, but the trade-off has always been that it takes an enormous the data in order to do… zero-knowledge proofs, Bulletproofs and zk-SNARKs, etc. that you need [to use for it]. So far, the practical private blockchains have all been breakthroughs that reduced the scale impact.”

This was followed by the author stating that MimbleWimble, on the other hand, takes a different approach for the same problem. Here, Andreas states that the blockchain is summarised in a way wherein only a final state summary is recorded.

“This is the best explanation I can give; it is a complicated set of mathematics that I don’t quite understand, I will be very honest there. What I can explain to you is, with MimbleWimble, you can discard some of the intermediate states, massively compressing the blockchain.”





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter




Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook



Priya is a full-time member of the reporting team at AMBCrypto. She is a finance major with one year of writing experience. She has not held any value in Bitcoin or other currencies.

News

HitBTC responds to allegations of insolvency, refutes claims made by Redditors

Avatar

Published

on

HitBTC responds to allegations of insolvency
Source: Unsplash

HitBTC, a Hong Kong-based exchange has been the center of accusations among users on Reddit, Twitter, and other forums. HitBTC users started complaining about issues regarding withdrawal and extensive procedures after one particular user @ProofofReserach put out a thread alleging insolvency of HitBTC.

To put an end to all the accusations, HitBTC has broken its silence with a blog post explaining their side of the story. According to HitBTC, their systems performed well during the winter of 2017-18, however, HitBTC mentioned that due to overwhelming demand for the services, they experienced bottlenecks at an operational level.

Referring to the BitcoinExchangeGuide article, HitBTC responded:



“A widely quoted article, in its entirety, is based on only 2 AML cases. One of them was initiated as part of the investigation into the December, 2018 BTCP security breach, at the request of the coin’s core team. Unfortunately, there is no clear indication of the nature of the second case that can be discerned from the article. The author of the article failed to track the deposit/withdrawal dynamics that did not uncover any irregularities. A simple block explorer or our public System Monitor would suffice for these purposes”

Additionally, referring to the altcoins being added and removed from the platform, the exchange said that they were honored to work with a diverse range of projects, however, since the crypto sphere was still nascent, there were lapses in their judgment in assessing the integration partners. With the above-mentioned prominent cases, HitBTC also addressed other topics.

@ProofofResearch replied to HitBTC’s blog:

“Is there a reason why you’re unable to tell people us where your Bitcoin storage is at? If what I published is as untrue as you claim it is, then providing a wallet address where your Bitcoin funds are stored will go a long way in *proving that*.”





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


Continue Reading

Trending