Connect with us

Altcoins

Poloniex enables GrinMW withdrawals by donating 1.27864 BTC to Grin General Fund

Avatar

Published

on

Poloniex enables GrinMW withdrawals by donating 1.27864 BTC to Grin General Fund
Source: Unsplash

Grin is a privacy and security-focused cryptocurrency that is completely community-driven and Poloniex was the first exchange to list it. Withdrawals for Grin have finally started on the exchange, according to their recent tweet.

Poloniex tweeted,

“Grin withdrawals are now live and we’ve made our first monthly donation—1.27864 BTC—to the @grinMW General Fund. #grin #mimblewimble”

Poloniex was satisfied with their decision to list the coin after seeing it develop over the months. In their blog, Poloniex stated,

“When we listed Grin, we pledged to provide a portion of our transaction fees to the Grin General Fund for a year — 50% for the first month and 25% for the next 11 months.
We are committed to providing monthly donations because we believe in supporting crypto projects which encourage distributed voluntary development and fair, decentralized methods of token distribution.”

As a result, Poloniex plans to support Grin developers by donating funds to the project. Grin’s mainnet launched on 15 January, 2019, and the community welcomed it with open arms.

Grin is focused on privacy, security, scalability, and fungibility, and is built by implementing MimbleWimble technology, which was proposed by Tom Elvis Jedusor in July 2016. The proposed technology gained a lot of traction in the Bitcoin community.

Poloniex is all for new crypto projects that are promising, as it stated in the blog,



“Grin is just one asset that represents our dedication to moving the crypto space forward. You can expect more from us in the weeks and months ahead …”

A Twitter user, @JEhrenhofer, commented,

“Great! Will you donate a fraction of profits to other projects without founder rewards?”

@21xHipster, another Twitter user, commented,

“What is #GRIN ?
Compact 5mb file that syncs full 2-month chain in 10 (!) minutes on dubious connection in the hotel …
Amazing, respectful, state of an art piece of software that pursue existential purpose of ultimate privacy.
All involved, @grinMW, @grincouncil thanks”





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter




Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook



Akash is your usual Mechie with an unusual interest in cryptos and day trading, ergo, a full-time journalist at AMBCrypto. Holds XRP due to peer pressure but otherwise found day trading with what little capital that he owns.

Altcoins

FLiK case: Utility tokens take another hit in case allegedly involving Rapper TI, claims prominent lawyer

Priya

Published

on

By

Source: Unsplash

Stephen Palley, a prominent lawyer at Anderson Kill, spoke out about the FLiK token case via his official Twitter handle. Notably, unlike most tokens in the space, FLiK made headlines because of its celebrity backing.

Towards the end of last year, it was reported that the US Rapper Clifford Joseph Harris Jr., who goes by the stage name T.I. and T.I.P., was sued for $5 million over the alleged failure of the token promoted by him and his partner, Ray Felton. The rapper was being sued by a group of 25 individuals who claimed that that they invested around $1.3 million in the tokens.

Additionally, there were allegations that the rapper used the raised money to increase the token’s value, following which the duo sold their holdings after the coin crashed. Other well-renowned celebrities such as Kevin Hart and Mark Cuban were also reportedly associated with this project.

On the recent developments surrounding the case, Stephen Palley stated,



“Utility tokens” take another hit in case allegedly involving rapper TI. Court says FLiK ICO tokens = securities under Howey Test, for motion to dismiss purposes. That they offered some functionality ≠ relevant given buyers’ expect of profits solely from efforts of others. 1/4″

Source: Twitter

Source: Twitter

Source: Twitter
The lawyer further stated that,”use of funds” was already determined by the defendants, “per the FLiK token whitepaper.” He went on to state that there was a time problem, adding that Federal Law rules that “unregistered sale” of security tokens were supposed to be reported within 12 months after the violation.

The lawyer concluded by tweeting,

“ps — form was never going to be exalted over substance, so none of this is a huge surprise. Also, this is a ruling on Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss so the Court takes the allegations as true for purposes of ruling. The merits still have to be litigated.”





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


Continue Reading

Trending