Connect with us


Taming of the Chinese Dragon: All Bark but no Bite; cryptocurrency industry shrugs off regulatory shackles




Taming of the Chinese Dragon: All Bark but no Bite; Cryptocurrency industry shrugs off regulatory shackles
Source: Pixabay

Part 3, the final segment of China’s regulation of the cryptocurrency industry.

Based on the trend of regulation, China has very methodically tried to breakdown the decentralized currency industry. First via engaging in semantic warfare by defining Bitcoin as a “virtual commodity,” thereby excluding it from the confines of “legal tender.” This stoked caution within the Chinese citizens and deterred them from using cryptocurrencies, fearing the authoritarian might of the government.

Surprisingly, the PBoC came out on the mild offensive against cryptocurrencies, rather than banning them outright, they mulled the possibility of conscious public disapproval if categorized as a “commodity.” However, this was not the case, with the market experiencing no out-of-the-norm fluctuation and no-adoption declines either.

China then began mimicking what they wanted to ban, by recruiting a team to not only study the virtual currency market but to issue a state-backed cryptocurrency market to rival Bitcoin. Interestingly, the PBoC managed to keep this project under wraps for almost two years before revealing it in early-2016. From this copy-cat move, it became clear that China was not going to let the crypto-matter slide and would pursue all means to engage in countering the digital asset.

Price changes did not manifest itself contrastingly, besides a mild increase in mid-January 2016, the price held. Interestingly, the market saw a massive surge come July 2016, by which time the China Bitcoin rumors did not hold much weight.

As the price of the top virtual currency and the collective market were witnessing unprecedented highs in the middle of 2017, China went on the outright offensive. The exchange and ICO crackdown was meant to be a huge blow to the crypto-industry but did not prove so. Crypto-trading platforms began operating via back-channels, masking operations and moving abroad to subvert the regulations. The immediate decline did cause concern in the market but it was soon forgotten as the market surged to its highest point by the end of the year, courtesy of the futures introduction by CME and CBOE, with some stating that the China crackdown had backfired.

China’s outright censorship began surfacing in 2018, first with their attack on offshore and mining activities and then their communication attacks. In March 2018, WeChat accounts saw a wave of account suspension and block, with fellow messaging giants, payment services following suit. The physical gathering focused on crypto-activities were also prohibited by the government.

As mentioned earlier, China’s iron fist on crypto-communications alongside Goldman Sachs’ trading desk withdrawal led to Bitcoin plummeting to its lowest point of the year, a level which it has still not managed to climb above. Many marked this point to be the initiation of the crypto-winter, with November and December 2018 being the undoubtable peak. Details are scant with reference to the isolated effect that the Chinese communication crackdown had on the market price, with many pointed to a continued effect of the winter.

Where do things currently stand?

Source: Trading View

The above timeline details the premise for the recently proposed mining ban. First, they came for the loyalists, who disavowed digital assets as it did not confine currencies, then they mirrored the “commodity” realizing its threat to their traditional economic system. Transactions were then the target, with ICOs and exchanges being put to the sword. As the industry grew smart, subverting regulation, the PBoC engaged in scattershot regulatory attacks in 2018, initially with miners, then offshore platforms and the inter and intra-communications between industry operatives.

Now, it looks like the Chinese government has come full circle, nipping the industry right in the bud, by proposing to eliminate the production of the digital currencies itself. It’s quite clear that the energy-conservation reason cited is a façade, as can be seen from previous regulatory actions taken by Beijing. China, like much of the more, is fearful of a decentralized currency that can disconnect financial control from traditional governance models.

A mining ban by the country that has a sheer dominance of miners will no doubt have a monumental effect on the market, as last week’s price correction hints. However, as historical price movements indicate, the cryptocurrency market often looks to contain the Chinese Dragon.

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


Bitcoin SV surges by 6.84% in an hour; community speculates massive behind-the-scenes pump

Biraajmaan Tamuly



Source: Pixabay

The cryptocurrency market has witnessed major price hikes over the past few weeks, with Craig Wright’s Bitcoin SV emerging as the market’s unlikely performer. The Craig Wright-backed virtual asset, which is supposed to follow Satoshi Nakamoto’s original idea, outperformed every top 10 cryptocurrency over the past week, recording a growth rate of 22.86%.

Source: CoinmarketCap

At press time, the coin had recorded a price hike of 6.84% over the hour, with the coin valued at $228. The coin was traded the highest on CoinBene exchange, where the trading pair of BCHSV/USDT gathered a volume of $96  million. The exchange was closely followed by ZBG exchange, where the trade accounted for 13.62% of the entire trading volume.

Source: Trading View

According to the chart released by Trading View, a massive green candlestick can be observed. The chart also indicated that at press time, the candles were charting over the Moving Average [MA]. This suggested that extremely high trading volumes were pegged with Bitcoin SV.

Many in the community have speculated that the surge might be due to a massive dump of the coin in the market, after the token hit stagnation since pumping by more than 247 percent recently. The aforementioned price pump pushed the price of the coin from $53.22 to $250.

Previously, it has been suggested that the major pump witnessed within the Bitcoin SV ecosystem might be laden with market manipulation, implying the participation of illicit entities in the conduct of a “pseudo-pump” of BSV’s market. Further, the de-listing of BSV by major exchanges such as Binance may have made it more susceptible to sudden price movements, according to some.

At press time, Bitcoin SV was positioned 8th on the cryptocurrency charts. Despite the pump however, historical trends suggest a major price correction may be in the offing too.

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Continue Reading