Connect with us


Julian Assange’s tryst with crypto-world: How a whistle-blower brought Bitcoin to the masses

Febin Jose



Source: Pixabay

Julian Assange’s ascension into mainstream media following his arrest in London on April 11, 2019, was nothing short of controversial, not just because of his alleged endeavors against the United States, but also for what it represented for many, the death of press freedom.

He may have been a pioneer in engineering a new era in journalism, but unknown to many is his association with the cryptocurrency/decentralization realm. Long before he even thought of Wikileaks, the Australian man played a crucial role in bringing forth decentralization. Moreover, after the launch of Bitcoin, he was one of the few who believed in what a truly decentralized currency had to offer.

However, to understand this, we have to go back to his feud with the US government and how the fight for unraveling buried truths propelled a new epoch in the history of Bitcoin.

Acoustic Shock

Wikileaks, Assange’s baby project, which grew by massive proportions following the leak of sensitive US government info relating to war crimes in the Middle East, was allegedly not in line with the government’s vision.

His reportage of war crimes in Iraq opened the US to universal criticism, something that had never happened previously in such magnitude. With little to defend its position, the US had to face the wrath of its own people as they vocally voiced their dissent.

This act made him an enemy of the state almost overnight, forcing him to eventually take refuge at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. However, his steadfast conduct marked the dawn of a new society, one where every citizen was aware of what their government was capable of doing.

The ‘Digital Gold’ Rush

However, even good journalism needs money to work with. No working bank or firm would come out in support of an organization that had gained ‘criminal’ status for leaking ‘sensitive military’ details. All transactions were associated with a name and risking one’s livelihood for finding the truth was not the ideal choice, even for the strongest of supporters.

Wikileaks and Assange knew this and their search for an alternative came to a halt when they came across Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin. It had everything they could have asked for, anonymity, speed, no borders and value. Inadvertently, Wikileaks was making history again. This time, by supporting an idea which would eventually grow into one of the biggest financial movements the world was not ready for, but was in dire need of.

A tale of flowers and friendship

Julian Assange finding Bitcoin was no coincidence. It was a well-calculated and researched move because unknown to many, he was already part of a movement aiming to bring ‘financial freedom’ to the masses, the Cypherpunk movement. The movement aimed at using cryptography and strong privacy tools to bring social and political changes.

His tryst with the movement made him wary of centralized institutions and according to reports, the Wikileaks Founder initiated a dialogue on digital cash, long before Bitcoin came into existence.

This made Bitcoin his favorite choice for funding his project. He even spoke about the same during a Reddit AMA. He said,

“Bitcoin is an extremely important innovation, but not in the way most people think. Bitcoin’s real innovation is a globally verifiable proof of publishing at a certain time… The blockchain nails down history, breaking Orwell’s dictum of ‘He who controls the present controls the past and he who controls the past controls the future.”

Brothers in Arms

Wikileaks started accepting Bitcoin as early as 2010 as soon as Assange understood what the currency was capable of. Though Wikileaks was in the limelight for the wrong reasons, it did help bring Bitcoin into the open. Such was the influence Wikileaks had that Satoshi Nakamoto himself commented on what Wikileaks accepting Bitcoin meant for the cryptocurrency ecosystem. In a statement from his now inactive account, he said,



With more information about Bitcoin and what it stood for, it became clear as to what both Assange and Bitcoin were: the Resistance. They were fighting against centralized control over value and data, two elements that needed to be free of control, according to them.

Since then, Wikileaks has supported Bitcoin and more recently, Zcash. As donations started pouring in, not only did Wikileaks grow, so did a relatively unknown player, a decentralized store of value called Bitcoin.

Adoption since then has been massive, with Wikileaks registering over $30,000 in donations using Bitcoin following Assange’s arrest on April 11. The magnitude of their successful partnership is reflected by the sheer amount of money they have received using cryptocurrencies. According to sources, the organization received over $22 million in Bitcoin and Zcash donations between 2010 and 2017.

Assange even thanked the organization for monetary support. He said,

“My deepest thanks to the US government, Senator McCain and Senator Lieberman for pushing Visa, MasterCard, Payal, AmEx, Mooneybookers, et al, into erecting an illegal banking blockade against WikiLeaks starting in 2010. It caused us to invest in Bitcoin — with > 50000% return.”

Therefore, it is no wonder that many cryptocurrency enthusiasts have come out in support of Assange, following his arrest. Roger Ver tweeted,

Source: Twitter

Source: Twitter

Even John McAfee showcased his support for the whistle-blower in a reply to Ver’s tweet,

Source: Twitter

Source: Twitter

Cobra, Co-founder of, tweeted,

Source: Twitter

Source: Twitter

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook

Febin Jose is a full-time journalist/editor at AMBCrypto. He believes that cryptocurrencies will navigate a volatile future and that Arsenal can still win a title. Lives around the "if it sounds like writing, I rewrite it" mantra.


Bitcoin [BTC]: Andreas Antonopoulos breaks down life cycle of a transaction on the BTC blockchain

Akash Anand



Bitcoin [BTC]: Andreas Antonopoulos breaks down the life cycle of a transaction on the BTC blockchain
Source: Pixabay

Bitcoin [BTC] and its intricacies have been a concept that many users in the cryptoverse have been trying to understand since its inception. In his latest video, Andreas Antonopoulos, a major Bitcoin bull and the author of Mastering Bitcoin, elucidated on the life cycle of a wallet transaction from start to finish.

Antonopoulos stated that from the point someone sends a transaction from a wallet to its confirmation on the Bitcoin blockchain, the wallet constructs a transaction by accumulating the BTC in the user’s wallet and assigning the addresses. The user’s wallet then transmits the transaction’s information to one of the many nodes it is connected to, from where it can be sent to ‘1, 2 or even 8 other nodes’. He added:

“The transaction is then transmitted to other nodes, which can be mining nodes, e-commerce payment gateways, and many such options. Each of those nodes will receive the transaction from your node and each of those, in turn, will validate every single transaction. When the nodes receive the transactions, they don’t’ know whether it was created by you or was forwarded and hence each of these transactions need to be validated individually.”

Antonopoulos went on to state that if all the nodes are validated, ie. if the payment details are correct and if it is confirmed that no double spend has occurred on the blockchain, then eventually through the process of ‘flood propagation’, the transaction information will be sent to every other node, out of which some may be mining nodes. In his words:

“Once the transaction reaches the mining pool, it maintains a pool of unconfirmed transactions, like a bucket where all this unconfirmed data is stored. This is the pool known as the mempool. Also, know that there isn’t THE mempool rather there is ‘A’ mempool. Information in separate mempools can be in a 99 percent overlap but there will never be a case where it will completely similar.”

According to the author, the mempool also serves the purpose of providing transaction for a miner to add a new block after which ‘the race is on’ for the next block. Miners usually have to construct a block and then solve the Proof of Work on it to eventually make it a confirmed block. Antonopoulos claimed that once the block is made, the information will be sent to the mining equipment to solve the PoW on that particular block and probably after a “billion hashes” the miners will find the block. The Bitcoin bull elucidated on the information transfer back by saying:

“Once the PoW is solved, the mining node will propagate the node back the same way as it received. The nodes validate the block on the way back and once all the nodes confirm its validity, then the user’s wallet will know that there is a confirmation on the transaction. That is the entire life cycle of a transaction.”

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Continue Reading