Connect with us
Active Currencies 14904
Market Cap $2,483,619,658,733.80
Bitcoin Share 51.28%
24h Market Cap Change $-0.77

Ripple: Crypto lawyer explains the chinks in SEC’s allegations against XRP

2min Read
Ripple: Crypto lawyer explains the chinks in SEC’s allegations against XRP

Share this article

  • Crypto lawyer Jeremy Hogan shared his thoughts on the SEC’s case against Ripple.
  • Hogan pointed out the shortcomings in the SEC’s citation of the Howey Test.

Popular crypto lawyer Jeremy Hogan recently took to Twitter to offer his thoughts on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s controversial lawsuit against Ripple.

Hogan, who is a partner at Hogan & Hogan, paid particular attention to the arguments and allegations presented by the wall street regulator before the court. 

XRP may be an investment contract at best

In his Twitter thread, Jeremy Hogan pointed out that as per the legislative definition of security, the possible category that XRP may be designated is that of an investment contract.

The crypto lawyer was referring to the famous Howey Test, which the securities regulator has repeatedly cited in its case against Ripple. The test refers to a U.S. Supreme Court case that helps determine if a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and would therefore be considered a security and be subject to the country’s securities laws. 

According to Hogan, the Howey Test doesn’t focus on the contract part of the investment contract but rather assumes that a contract existed and was required for an explicit legal agreement.

The crypto lawyer argued that in Ripple’s case, the SEC had failed to argue that there was an explicit contract of investment. Instead, the regulator has stated that the purchase agreement is all that is required.

Hogan believes that a simple purchase agreement only proves that Ripple had an obligation to transfer XRP to the buyer, with no mention of expected profits on the investment. 

“The issue is NOT whether Ripple used money from the sale of XRP to fund its business. The issue is whether the SEC has proven that there was either an implied or explicit “contract” between Ripple and XRP purchasers relating to their “investment.” There was no such contract,” Jeremy Hogan stated. 

Share

Saman Waris works as a News Editor at AMBCrypto. She has always been fascinated by how the tides of finance and technology shape communities across demographics. Cryptocurrencies are of particular interest to Saman, with much of her writing centered around understanding how ideas like Momentum and Greater Fool theories apply to altcoins, specifically, memecoins. A graduate in history, Saman worked the sports beat before diving into crypto. Prior to joining AMBCrypto 2 years ago, Saman was a News Editor at Sportskeeda. This was preceded by her stint as Editor-in-Chief at EssentiallySports.
Read the best crypto stories of the day in less than 5 minutes
Subscribe to get it daily in your inbox.
Please check the format of your first name and/or email address.

Thank you for subscribing to Unhashed.