Connect with us
Active Currencies 14778
Market Cap $2,557,616,555,646.10
Bitcoin Share 51.24%
24h Market Cap Change $0.70

Senator assures there will be clarity in US Infra bill’s tax reporting requirements

2min Read

Share this article

The $1 trillion US Infrastructure Bill has sent waves of panic through the crypto community. Stakeholders across the ecosystem wonder whether they’ll be able to comply with the bill’s stringent reporting requirements. Now, senators are stepping forward to be heard.

Lummis illuminates her stance

On 19 November, 2021 Senator Cynthia Lummis promised to make sure that the bill’s tax reporting requirements would be “clear.” She acknowledged the need for consumer protection but also warned against “stifling innovation.”

Lummis’s tweet came after members of Congress submitted a letter to also voice their concerns regarding the US Infrastructure Bill. These signers worried the regulations would affect the definition of a “broker” in the crypto industry, and potentially send crypto innovation to foreign shores.

Chilling the industry

Why worry? To refresh your memory, 6050I is a provision of the US Tax Code, which would make those receiving more than $10,000 in “digital assets” responsible for gathering the sender’s personal details – social security number included – and reporting them to the government authorities in 15 days.

What’s more, lawmakers believe that the definition of a “broker” under the provision means that even miners, developers, lenders, stakers, marketplace clients, companies, and traders could face imprisonment if they fail to comply.

Naturally, lawmakers aren’t the only ones feeling tense. Fear and frustration have cut across coin preferences to unite participants all over the crypto industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong claimed 6050I could possibly “freeze” activities like DeFi.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin trader and influencer Peter McCormack called it an “invasion of privacy.”

Race of the bills

That said, senators aren’t waving the white flag just yet. As of 19 November, there were at least two proposed bills to address the infrastructure bill’s effect on crypto. Senator Ted Cruz, who introduced an amendment, discussed how the infrastructure bill could hurt Texas’ swelling crypto presence.

His official release about the bill stated,

“This mandate to collect names, addresses, and transactions of customers means almost every company even tangentially related to cryptocurrency may suddenly be forced to surveil their users.”

Meanwhile, the “Keep Innovation in America Act” newly introduced by Congressmen Patrick McHenry and Tim Ryan, reiterated the need for a better broker definition under the bill, and proposed changes to Section 80603 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

One finding in the amendment stated,

“Miners and validators, hardware and software developers, and protocol developers are not actual brokers and do not collect or have reason to collect the information required under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.”


Sahana is a full-time journalist at AMBCrypto. She has a Masters in Journalism and her areas of study include crypto-regulation, digital society, privacy, and intersectionality. Ask her about film photography and philately.
Read the best crypto stories of the day in less than 5 minutes
Subscribe to get it daily in your inbox.
Please check the format of your first name and/or email address.

Thank you for subscribing to Unhashed.