Connect with us

News

U.K policymakers debate prohibition on crypto investment products… Details inside

Published

on

U.K policymakers debate prohibition on crypto investment products
Source: Unsplash


  • The Regulatory Policy Committee of the United Kingdom has shared its thoughts on the measure taken by the Financial Conduct Authority.
  • The Financial Conduct Authority had prohibited the sale, marketing, and distribution of derivatives and exchange-traded notes (ETNs) of crypto assets.

The United Kingdom’s Regulatory Policy Committee has challenged the stance of the Financial Conduct Authority on the sale, marketing, and distribution of derivatives and exchange-traded notes (ETNs) of crypto assets to the country’s retail investors. 

Prohibition by the Financial Conduct Authority

The Financial Conduct Authority, U.K’s top financial regulator, implemented the prohibition in question back in January 2021. The implementation restricted companies operating in the country from offering crypto investment products. This included derivatives, futures, options, and ETNs to retail investors. 

The prohibition came into force despite resistance from most respondents to the regulator’s consultation paper. According to a recent report compiled by the Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC), the FCA’s implementation was “not fit for purpose.” The FCA gave the rating to the Business Impact Target assessment (BIT). 

What is the Regulatory Policy Committee’s opinion?

According to the RPC, FCA’s measures led to an overall annual loss of more than £268 million. In the RPC’s opinion, the regulator failed to support its assumptions with evidence. Moreover, it had not provided enough explanation for the cost-benefit analysis used to derive the equivalent annual net direct cost to business (EANDCB). 

The document read:

“The assessment also fails to clearly establish what would happen to the market in the absence of the intervention, limiting the ability to determine the change resulting from the measure.”

The Regulatory Policy Committee claimed that the BIT by the FCA focused particularly on the negative impact of the prohibited crypto investment products. As per the RCA, the assessment also failed to identify if the prohibition will lead to a positive impact on product innovation.

The regulator was also advised to consider the impact that its measure will have on small and micro businesses (SMBSs).

Read the best crypto stories of the day in less than 5 minutes

Subscribe to get it daily in your inbox.


Please select your Email Preferences.

Ser Suzuki Shillsalot has 8 years of experience working as a Senior Investigative journalist at The SpamBot Times. He completed a two-hour course in journalism from a popular YouTube video and was one of the few to give it a positive rating. Shillsalot's writings mainly focus on shilling his favourite cryptos and trolling anyone who disagrees with him. P.S - There is a slight possibility the profile pic is AI-generated. You see, this account is primarily used by our freelancer writers and they wish to remain anonymous. Wait, are they Satoshi? :/

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Disclaimer: AMBCrypto's content is meant to be informational in nature and should not be interpreted as investment advice. Trading, buying or selling cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk investment and every reader is advised to do their own research before making any decisions.