Connect with us
Active Currencies 14588
Market Cap $2,677,191,820,595.15
Bitcoin Share 50.32%
24h Market Cap Change $0.51

Anti-anonymity or anti-freedom? EU bans crypto transfers on unhosted wallets

2min Read

Share this article

The European Union, on 31 March, voted in favor of outlawing all anonymous crypto transactions. Transactions of any size, both payers and recipients of even the smallest digital asset payment identified would fall under this litigation. Overall, it might be a massive blow for cryptocurrency privacy advocates in Europe.

Anti-Anonymity rules

The ECON and LIBE committees voted to approve an anti-money laundering amendment to the EU’s Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR). It would require crypto service providers ⁠— usually exchanges ⁠— to verify the owners’ identities of unhosted wallets with which they transact in advance of a transaction. It applies to conventional transactions of over 1000 EUR to the entire crypto sector.

Today’s vote passed thin margins, with the two relevant compromises given by 58/52 and 62/51respectively. In general, the left-leaning Renew and S&D parties voted in favor of the changes, while the right-leaning European People’s Party (EPP) voted against them.

The party called the latest changes a “de facto ban on self-hosted wallets”. The next step required the new legislation to go through tri-logue talks between representatives of the European Parliament, the European Council, and the European Commission as early as mid-April.

Against anonymity… or freedom?

Not so surprisingly, these developments faced significant blow back from the Council and Commission and individual crypto enthusiasts globally. One consequence was that transactions between unhosted wallets and cryptocurrency exchanges would become far more troublesome and expensive.

Something that the CEO of San Francisco-based crypto exchange Coinbase, Brian Armstrong warned about. He saw this legislation as “anti-innovation, anti-privacy, and anti-law enforcement.”

In addition, Tether and Bitfinex CTO Paolo Ardoino opined that the aforementioned litigation represented a ‘big step back for human rights.’ Needless to say, other enthusiasts reiterated similar concerns regarding this regulatory decision.

Moreover, the Crypto Council for Innovation too raised red flags.

‘If ultimately approved, these new measures will create fundamental privacy, innovation, and access issues.’

Source: CCI




Shubham is a full-time journalist/ Crypto data analyst at AMBCrypto. A Master's graduate in Accounting and Finance, Shubham's writings mainly focus on the cryptocurrency sector with particular emphasis on market research studies and communications for >2 years. Also, a die-hard Chelsea fan #KTBFFH.
Read the best crypto stories of the day in less than 5 minutes
Subscribe to get it daily in your inbox.
Please check the format of your first name and/or email address.

Thank you for subscribing to Unhashed.