Connect with us

Bitcoin Cash

Bitcoin SV [BSV] slips by over 9% followed by Bitcoin Cash [BCH] and Litecoin [LTC]

Namrata Shukla



Bitcoin SV [BSV] slips by over 9% followed by Bitcoin Cash [BCH] and Litecoin [LTC]
Source: Pixabay

The cryptocurrency market has been bleeding since the new year began and hasn’t seen a sign of relief. As of January 14, the coins that have registered biggest loss are Bitcoin SV [BSV], Bitcoin Cash [BCH], and Litecoin [LTC].

Source: CoinMarketCap

Source: CoinMarketCap

Bitcoin SV [BSV], the tenth largest coin on the CoinMarketCap, has been falling over the last few days and has not managed to make a steady recovery. At the time of press, the coin has slipped by 9.53% over the past 24-hours with a market cap of $1.3 billion. The coin recorded a 24-hour trade volume of $106 million and has fallen by 13.21% over the past week. The coin has managed to register growth of 0.45% over the past hour.

The coin was highly traded on Bit-Z with BCHSV/BTC pair. The exchange recorded a volume of $17 million. Binance booked the second highest trading volume of $13 million with BCHSV/USDT pair. Binance was followed by UPbit with BSV/KRW pair and the volume recorded was $11 million.

Source: CoinMarketCap

Source: CoinMarketCap

As per the one day chart of Bitcoin Cash [BCH], the fourth largest coin had fallen by 6.90% in the past 24 hours. The coin was valued at $126.01 with a market cap of $2.2 billion. The coin registered a 24-hour trade volume of $173 million with a staggering fall of 24.29% over the past week. The coin is still falling by 0.08% over the past hour with no sign of recovery.

The coin was highly traded on Huobi with $16.5 million with BCH/USDT pair. Huobi was followed by Fatbtc, which recorded a volume of $10 million with BCH/CNY pair. On the third place, ZBG registered a trading volume of $9 million with BCHABC/USDT pair.

Source: CoinMarketCap

Source: CoinMarketCap

The third biggest loser was Litecoin [LTC], which slipped by 6.55% over the past 24-hours with a market cap of $1.8 billion. The coin has registered a 24-hour trade volume of $534 million with a massive fall of 21.05% over the past week. The coin has not attained stability, as it registered a growth of 0.15% in the past hour.

The coin was highly traded on DOBI Exchange as it registered a volume of $53 million with LTC/BTC pair. The second highest trade was registered by ZB.COM with a volume of $48 million and the third position was taken by OKEx with a volume of $39 million with LTC/BTC pair.

The market is just seen to fall every day, however, the Tron [TRX] is the only coin swinging in the extremes. The coin has been seen pumping, followed by getting ravaged by the fear, and again pumping, at the time of press.

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook

Namrata is a full-time journalist and is interested in covering everything under the sun, with a special focus on the crypto market.


BSV STN is mining 1.4-gigabyte blocks; Is this a scaling solution or a journey towards centralization?




Source: Unsplash

Bitcoin SV, the fork of Bitcoin Cash, has set up an STN [Scaling Test Network], specifically intended to test on-chain scaling for large blocks, which also acts as a standard network in the latest update of Bitcoin SV. It was noted that the STN was mining blocks that were more than 1 GB in block size, a development that was celebrated in the BSV camp after a Twitter user, @two2wheel2life, tweeted,

BSV has a total of four such networks defined, i.e., Mainnet, testnet, regtest, and STN. According to the website, STN was implemented to reduce the impact of scalability testing on testnet and to preserve testnet as a network for testing of applications built on top of Bitcoin SV, without requiring testnet users to make significant hardware available.

Block 11891 on the STN was 0.95 GB in size and processed a total of 9530 transactions in the block. Block 11901 was 1 GB in size, and block 11902 was 1.4 GB in size, which could possibly be the biggest block mined on the STN.


Is Bigger Better?

The question of bigger block sizes has sparked quite a few debates, be it Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, or Bitcoin SV. It was one of the reasons why Bitcoin Cash forked from Bitcoin and why Bitcoin SV forked from Bitcoin Cash.

However, does massive block size really solve the scaling problem without any drawbacks? The Operations Manager of STN, Brad Kristensen, had some interesting things to say to AMBCrypto about the recent achievements of the STN.

Brad stated,

“We’re very pleased with the results, and I think it’s a strong signal of what is to come from Bitcoin SV on mainnet as we continue to increase adoption. The STN is running the same public release available right now (0.2.0). Anyone can join the STN to test their applications /services.”

According to BSV’s roadmap, the first upgrade for the project will be ‘Quasar,’ which is proposed for July 24, 2019, and will concentrate on scaling by increasing the default block size hard cap.

Centralization or scaling?

Andreas Antonopoulos, a prominent Bitcoin advocate, had a different opinion on the rise in block size for Bitcoin SV. When AMBCrypto reached out to him, he commented,

“Large blocks have a centralizing effect on mining and node operators. It is unlikely that the main BTC chain will increase the blocksize as it has taken a different path for scaling, via layer-2 payment channels (Lightning Network) and on-chain optimizations (Segwit, Schnorr etc.).”

As stated by Antonopoulos at the ‘Bitcoins in Bali’ meetup on June 27, 2017, if the block size is increased in orders of magnitude at a rate that is proportional to the increase in user base, a difficult problem will emerge wherein Bitcoin transitions from a decentralized to a centralized system.

Additionally, Antonopoulos said,

“If my block takes 11 minutes to validate, then i’m off the blockchain, which means fewer people can validate independently, which means the system becomes centralized. With which one of these increases, fewer people can participate in the validation process, fewer people can participate in storing the data, and fewer people can participate in being independent actors. We go from a system that is decentralized to a system that gradually gets more and more centralized.”

The above gives a clear idea of what could happen if the block size increases. However, Craig Wright announced in one of his Medium articles of his plans to increase the block size, giving his opinion on the same,

“The reality is that scaling on-chain is much simpler than anyone likes to admit. There is nothing special to be done in order to achieve this, it is just allowing commercial systems to compete and to remove the false idea that home use and hobby nodes need to be subsidized”

So, how will BSV fare? Will it still be successful after implementing larger blocksize or will it accept the centralization that comes with increased block sizes? Only time will tell.

Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter

Continue Reading