Connect with us

Analysis

Cardano [ADA] Technical Analysis: Token dwelling in the bearish zone despite a slight rise

Avatar

Published

on

Cardano [ADA] Technical Analysis: Token dwelling in the bearish zone despite a slight rise
Source: Pixabay

The top-ten cryptocurrencies on the CoinMarketCap has witnessed a modest leap in its valuation in the last 24 hours along with the eleventh-largest digital currency Cardano [ADA]. After a momentary decline in its price in the evening of 23 January, ADA has managed to gear up steadily, exhibiting a bullish second half later that day.

At the time of writing, ADA held a market cap of $1.12 billion, priced at $0.043. The trading volume recorded for the coin was $22.03 million with a slim gain of 1.92%.

1-hour

Source: Trading View

Source: Trading View

During the one-hour time frame, Cardano [ADA] registered a low-key uptrend from of $0.042 to $0.044, the corresponding downtrend recorded was from $0.046 to $0.044. Immediate resistance was marked at $0.044 and that of immediate support at $0.043.

The Bollinger Bands predicts a rise in price volatility for the ADA coin during the mid of 23, January. This indicates a potential price fluctuation in the already unstable crypto market.

The Klinger Oscillator also marks the coin following a bearish pattern with the signal line treading above the reading line.

Further, the Awesome Indicator graph also depicts a bearish trend with the lines in red.

1-day

Source: Trading View

Source: Trading View

Cardano [ADA] experienced a significant uptrend of $0.043 from $0.030. However, the coin fell through massively and sustained a downtrend from $0.081 to $0.051. The coin held an initial resistance at $0.046 and the support at $0.041.

With dotted lines aligned right above the candles, Parabolic SAR depicts the coin in the bearish sphere despite early morning gains.

The MACD indicator pictures a bearish spiral for the coin with the MACD line positioned below the Signal line.

The Chaikin Money Flow, predicts a bearish market for ADA with the graph hovering a little below the zero-line, indicating a flush out of money from the market.

Conclusion:

Although the CMF indicator indicates the coin heading towards a bullish zone in the near future, with the graph very close to the zero-line, all the other indicators for the two time periods showed a strong pull towards the bear’s territory.





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter




Follow us on Telegram | Twitter | Facebook



Chayanika holds a Journalism degree and is currently working with AMBCrypto. She is inquisitive about everything that the Blockchain Technology has to offer.

News

Bitcoin and Ethereum Classic find themselves on opposite ends of the 51% attack spectrum

Avatar

Published

on

Bitcoin and Ethereum Classic find themselves on opposite ends of the 51% attack spectrum
Source: Unsplash

Every revolutionary product comes with its own fallacy. However, to its internal metrics, in order for that product to remain adherent to the principle it hopes to expound, the cryptocurrency world is no less. Bitcoin [BTC] and other Proof-of-Work [PoW] cryptos have an in-built fallacy as well, the dreaded “51 percent attack.”

A recent study by cryptocurrency analytics firm LongHash, detailed the cryptocurrencies that are the closest to being subjected to the aforementioned attack.

The report looked at ten of the most significant PoW coins including, Bitcoin, Ethereum [ETH], Bitcoin Cash [BCH], Litecoin [LTC], Dash [DASH], Bitcoin SV [BSV], Zcash [ZEC], Monero [XMR], Ethereum Classic [ETC], and Bitcoin Gold [BTG].

Prior to detailing the study, Longhash listed out the two key points required to execute a 51 percent attack. First, a single mining pool/entity/individual would have to control over 50 percent of a network’s mining power. Second, the energy expenses related to the same, based on renting or sheer purchase of mining power.

Dividing the parameters of performance into two key parts, LongHash initially looked at the one-hour attack cost based on data from OnChainFX as on June 19, and consequently, the percentage of mining power available for rent on NiceHash. The matrix for an unsuccessful attack would be a high one-hour attack cost with low power availability, deeming the network “quite safe.”

Source: LongHash

Bitcoin took the top spot, with the report stating that there exists “very little power available to rent,” coupled with a “very high hourly attack cost.”

Traversing down the estimate cost Y-axis, several coins are scattered including, LTC, ETH, BCH, ZEC, BSV, DASH, and XMR, citing low power available via NiceHash. However, the estimated cost to rent the mining power is fairly low.

The report added,

“Most tokens, however, are clustered in the bottom-right corner of our chart, with low mining power availability and hourly attack costs north of $10,000, which makes them appear relatively safe.”

Moving horizontally further down the total mining power X-axis, BTG is the sole cryptocurrency exhibiting around 35 percent mining power availability on Nice Hash, with the lowest estimated cost to rent 51 percent of mining power for sixty minutes.

The biggest worry by far, was Ethereum Classic. The ETH hardfork had more than 80 percent of its mining power available on NiceHash, while the hourly attack was estimated to cost less than $10,000.

Earlier this year, the ETC network was the subject of a 51 percent attack, with several exchanges pausing ETC-related transactions in the process. The attack led to several cases of network double-spends and re-organisations totaling around $1.1 million or 219,500 ETC.





Subscribe to AMBCrypto’s Newsletter


Continue Reading