Connect with us


Ethereum Name Service developers disagree with Vitalik ‘here’ but ENS remains…



Source: Unsplash

Ethereum [ETH] co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum Name Service [ENS] developers are at loggerheads due to the newly proposed pricing arrangements. On 9 September, Vitalik published a post via his ENS website, asking if the domains should follow a recurring pricing structure.

According to him, ENS domains are very cheap as the cost to maintain a five-word one was at most $5. While highlighting the property rights, and efficient market challenges, Vitalik mentioned that an increased price structure could offer a solution. Additionally, he mentioned the possibility of  using the revenue generated to fund the ENS Decentralized Autonomous Organization (ENSDAO).

It’s a no-no

In response to the ETH founder’s proposal, ENS developers seemed to be on an opposite site of the page. First, it was Nick Johnson pointing out some flaws in the proposal.

The developer noted that Vitalik’s piece was thoughtful. However, he argued that there were some design constraints, as well as the externalities of the naming system. Also, the idea behind paying more for a name may be untempting. Johnson said,

“The people hurt by a change in ownership may not be the same people who get paid for the name. The value of a name to a third-party does not necessarily correspond to the profit gained by its current owner owning it.”

Interestingly, Johnson was not the only one opposed to Vitalik’s idea. Another ENS developer, Jeff Lau also shared Johnson’s opinion. She cited that Vitalik focused too much on funding rather than user accessibility in his proposal.

For ENS, it was a case of being unperturbed by the happenings. In fact, it looked like a worse case for the token price as it chose the downward trend rather than follow the crypto market recovery in the last 24 hours.

Based on CoinMarketCap’s report, ENS had lost 4.86% of its previous day value at press time. Besides, its 24-hour volume had also dwindled in the same period according to the on-chain platform, Santiment. While it was $132.85 million on 9 September, the records at press time showed the volume at $117.71 million.

Source: Santiment

This decrease in volume also expands to domain registrations. Despite hitting two million registrations less than a month after reaching one million,  more sign-ups have failed to reach impeccable numbers.

According to Dune Analytics, the total number of registrations was now 2,310,109. September registration was up to 152,077 but the likelihood of hitting a million looks bleak.

Read the best crypto stories of the day in less than 5 minutes

Subscribe to get it daily in your inbox.

Please select your Email Preferences.

Ser Suzuki Shillsalot has 8 years of experience working as a Senior Investigative journalist at The SpamBot Times. He completed a two-hour course in journalism from a popular YouTube video and was one of the few to give it a positive rating. Shillsalot's writings mainly focus on shilling his favourite cryptos and trolling anyone who disagrees with him. P.S - There is a slight possibility the profile pic is AI-generated. You see, this account is primarily used by our freelancer writers and they wish to remain anonymous. Wait, are they Satoshi? :/

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Disclaimer: AMBCrypto's content is meant to be informational in nature and should not be interpreted as investment advice. Trading, buying or selling cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk investment and every reader is advised to do their own research before making any decisions.