Bitcoin’s institutional support comes at a cost, here’s why
Bitcoin has seen a massive influx of institutions and their money creating a crisis on the buy side, as all of the sell-side liquidity is being absorbed. This dearth has created a demand for bitcoin leading to the stark increase in price as seen in the last quarter of 2020. With the year almost at the end, bitcoin’s market cap hit $500 billion aka $0.5 trillion and it seems like dreams are turning into reality, right?
At press time, Bitcoin’s market cap surpasses that of JP Morgan, CitiBank, Goldman Sachs, etc. So, we have won, right? Bitcoin is finally going mainstream.
No. A big fat “No”, we haven’t actually won.
Technically speaking bitcoin is gaining mainstream adoption but if we look closely it isn’t adoption, it’s an exodus from traditional finance.
Yes, bitcoin has surpassed the market cap of many well-known institutions but there is a counter-logic at play here and let’s explore why this could be bad for bitcoin as it shifts it into a whole new asset class.
So far, bitcoin has mostly been retail-driven, but the recent entry of institutions has caused this characteristic to erode. 16.12% of the BTC realized market cap is now owned by institutional investors ie., considering bitcoin’s realized market cap of $186 billion.
The actual kicker is that Grayscale’s bitcoin trust constitutes $16.3 billion out of the $19 billion AUM.
Excluding Grayscale, this value comes up to 7.52% being owned by institutions; meaning, what took Grayscale to accumulate $16 billion worth of BTC, took only a quarter or so [approximately] for institutions to accumulate.
Clearly, institutions are not accumulating, they are gobbling up the bitcoin supply. More so, if this continues, it will cause the price of bitcoin to climb higher at a steady yet slower pace.
That’s fine, but at what cost?
As mentioned earlier, bitcoin is and has been a retail-driven market for a very long time. Institutions need to buy bitcoin due to the unfavorable conditions in the traditional market.
This has 2 major implications,
- If institutions continue to accumulate BTC, it will no doubt increase the price due to the high demand and low supply. However, when they do want to take profit or de-risk their portfolio and hold cash or shift it back to its origin, this will cause mass dumping. Basically, the large-scale entry of institutions will make bitcoin more correlated to the traditional world because all institutions think alike and play safe.
- Now, there is a dearth of sell-side liquidity due to institutions’ entry, similarly, there will be too much bitcoin on the market from institutions during the profit-taking time causing bitcoin to crash on a scale not seen before.