Connect with us

News

Former SEC Chief calls ‘Regulation by Enforcement’ catchphrase a nonsense

Published

on

Former SEC Chief calls 'Regulation by Enforcement' catchphrase a nonsense
Source: Unsplash


  • Former SEC Chief lambasts “cryptocurrency lobbyists” for labeling SEC enforcement actions as “regulation by enforcement.”
  • Besides, courts have upheld a broad array of SEC cases involving crypto-related offerings.

John Reed Stark, Former Chief, of the Securities, and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of Internet Enforcement has lambasted “cryptocurrency lobbyists” for labeling SEC enforcement actions as “regulation by enforcement.”

He has termed this phrase as a “Bogus Big Crypto Catch Phrase.” He believes the argument is “sorely misguided” because that is exactly how securities regulations worked.

Stark, a crypto skeptic, stated in a blog post on 22 January that the argument is completely misguided because it was simply how securities regulations worked.

Securities regulation, according to Stark, works through litigation and enforcement. The adaptability of SEC statutory weaponry is an SEC hallmark, allowing SEC enforcement to combat fraud.

“In fact, the repetitive chorus of RBE [regulation by enforcement] is not only a misguided, deflective effort designed to tap into sympathetic libertarian and anti-regulatory mores – it’s also utter nonsense,” added Stark.

In the post, Stark wrote that when the SEC Office of Internet Enforcement was established in 1998, there were apprehensions that the regulations were too vague and that regulation by enforcement would curtail the growth of the internet. In retrospect, relying on the flexibility of securities regulation to police the internet was a mistake.

SEC handling multiple high-profile crypto cases

“Moreover, vigorous online SEC enforcement efforts also paved the way for legitimate technological innovations to flourish, rendering markets more efficient and transparent, thereby allowing investors more opportunities for success,” he said.

The SEC has launched a number of high-profile cases against crypto companies such as Ripple and LBRY in recent years, prompting some critics to argue that the SEC has been using enforcement actions to develop the law on a case-by-case basis rather than creating clear regulations.

“Indeed, courts have upheld a broad array of SEC cases involving crypto-related offerings. In fact, in the 127 crypto-related enforcement actions already filed by the SEC, the SEC has not lost a single case,” argued Stark.

Read the best crypto stories of the day in less than 5 minutes

Subscribe to get it daily in your inbox.


Please select your Email Preferences.

Ser Suzuki Shillsalot has 8 years of experience working as a Senior Investigative journalist at The SpamBot Times. He completed a two-hour course in journalism from a popular YouTube video and was one of the few to give it a positive rating. Shillsalot's writings mainly focus on shilling his favourite cryptos and trolling anyone who disagrees with him. P.S - There is a slight possibility the profile pic is AI-generated. You see, this account is primarily used by our freelancer writers and they wish to remain anonymous. Wait, are they Satoshi? :/

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Disclaimer: AMBCrypto's content is meant to be informational in nature and should not be interpreted as investment advice. Trading, buying or selling cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk investment and every reader is advised to do their own research before making any decisions.