SEC chief Gensler now eyeing crypto staking and ‘poker chip’ stablecoins

In recent weeks, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] has brought several crypto companies into the regulatory spotlight. Coinbase was warned about its high-interest crypto-product Lend, with the SEC threatening to sue if it launched.

Unsiwap also felt the heat as it was reportedly investigated. Meanwhile, the SEC vs Ripple lawsuit saw the court denying Ripple’s request for documents revealing SEC’s trading policies on digital assets.

Even as these events unfolded, SEC Chair Gary Gensler spoke to Washington Post journalist David Ignatius about cryptocurrency and the SEC’s powers.

Cop on the beat

Gensler first stressed that crypto tokens were a “highly speculative asset class” and defended his dedication to investor and consumer protection. He admitted that the SEC had a broad definition of securities and that it gave the agency a “great deal of authority.”

Encouraging crypto trading platforms to come in for SEC registration, Gensler said,

“Now, not many have, and so I do really fear that we’ll keep bringing these enforcement cases, but there’s going to be a problem. There’s going to be a problem on lending platforms or trading platforms. And frankly, when that happens, I think a lot of people are going to get hurt.”

Gensler also voiced concerns about staking and added,

“We’ll also be the cop on the beat and bringing those enforcement actions, as well.”

Coming to stablecoins, Gensler used his familiar crypto-Wild West comparison and likened stablecoins to poker chips at the casino. He also explained that though the SEC had “robust authorities,” there were some gaps. He hinted the agency might work with the U.S. Congress to regulate stablecoins.

Notes on Evergrande

With liabilities worth around $300 billion, the crisis of Evergrande, China’s second largest property developer, has shocked the world market – and the crypto sector. Soon the Hong Kong-based, dollar-pegged stablecoin Tether [USDT] came under scrutiny. The company had to confirm that it did not hold commercial papers, debts, or securities issued by Evergrande.

Ignatius also asked Gensler whether Evergrande could affect the American market. Gensler just confirmed that Evergrande was not registered and did not trade on American capital markets.

However, he added,

“…it is possible, from time to time, that we too in America will react to other economies’ and nations’ shocks. And particularly China’s economy is so large relative to Europe’s or our own.”

In essence, the interview came with a familiar promise for crypto innovators and traders. Referring to warning signs and flashing lights signaling a spill in aisle three, Gensler said he would rather “get ahead of it.”